- May 5, 2026
- 11:32 pm
- World News
The Israeli Ambassador to Ukraine, Michael Brodsky, stated that Israel supported the UN resolution in which Russia’s actions against Ukraine were called aggression. According to him, Jerusalem’s position on Ukraine’s territorial integrity has remained unchanged since 2014.
This was stated on May 5, 2026, in an interview with the Ukrainian program “Duma. Y“, where the diplomat spoke not only about Russia’s war against Ukraine but also about Iran, Hamas, Israel’s security, Ukraine’s defense experience, extradition, the USA, and complex diplomacy amid a major war.
For the Israeli audience, this interview is important because Brodsky effectively formulated several key theses: Iran remains Israel’s main enemy, Russia is conducting aggression against Ukraine, and Ukraine and Israel are in a similar historical situation today — both countries face forces that not only pressure them but want to destroy them.
Iran, Russia, and the common language of threats
At the beginning of the conversation, the ambassador was asked who is more dangerous for the world today — Iran or Russia.
Brodsky answered directly: from an Israeli point of view, Iran. He called it a terrorist state that is behind numerous attacks and wars and has created a network of proxy structures and terrorist organizations around Israel.
This is an important formulation.
For Israel, Iran is not just a regional adversary. It is the center of a hostile system that operates through Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and other forces constantly trying to deplete Israel, strike at the civilian sector, and keep the country in a state of constant threat.
But the Ukrainian topic in this conversation was no less sharp.
When it came to Russia’s actions against Ukraine, Brodsky reminded: Israel supported the UN resolution where Russian actions were called aggression. He also emphasized that Israel has supported Ukraine’s territorial integrity since 2014.
Why Israel is cautious in words about Moscow
The interview also showed another side of Israeli diplomacy — caution.
Brodsky acknowledged that Israel’s relations with Russia are complex and multilayered. He explained this by several factors: Russia’s active presence in the Middle East, its role in the region, and the large Jewish community living in Russia.
This is not an excuse for Moscow.
Rather, it is an explanation of why Israel often speaks more harshly in closed channels than in public statements. The ambassador himself noted that behind diplomatic courtesies and beautiful words, there can sometimes be completely different content.
Here lies the main nerve of Israeli foreign policy: the country is forced to simultaneously consider the threat of Iran, Russian presence in Syria and other Middle Eastern nodes, the security of Jewish communities, relations with the USA, and the moral position on Ukraine.
Hamas in Moscow and Russia’s cooperation with Iran
Separately, Brodsky commented on the arrival of Hamas representatives in Moscow after the massacre on October 7.
According to him, Israel directly told Russia that it considers such contacts indirect support for terror. This is an especially important assessment because it concerns not theory but a specific event after the largest terrorist attack against Israelis.
The topic of Russian-Iranian cooperation sounded no less harsh.
Brodsky said that military cooperation between Russia and Iran cannot but worry Israel. And this is understandable: Iranian weapons are used against Ukraine, and the Iranian regime simultaneously wages war against Israel through its proxies.
For Kyiv, this connection is also fundamental. Ukraine sees how Iranian drones have become part of Russia’s war against cities, energy, and civilian infrastructure.
Thus, a general picture emerges: Moscow and Tehran act on different fronts, but their logic is similar — pressure on the civilian population, reliance on fear, destruction of infrastructure, and an attempt to break the will of society.
That is why for readers of Nikk News — Israel News | Nikk.Agency this interview has a special meaning. It shows that the Ukrainian-Israeli conversation about security has long gone beyond ordinary diplomacy: it is about the survival of states living next to enemies who do not recognize their right to a peaceful future.
“Israel and Ukraine — two countries that want to be destroyed”
The strongest phrase of the interview sounded in the block about the strategic similarity of Ukraine and Israel.
Brodsky agreed that today Israel and Ukraine are two countries that want to be destroyed. According to him, in this sense, the states are in a very similar situation.
The difference is in the opponents and their capabilities.
Ukraine opposes nuclear Russia. Israel opposes Iran, which seeks to acquire nuclear weapons and, according to the Israeli side, may use them against the Jewish state if given the opportunity.
This thought explains a lot.
For Israel, the Iranian nuclear program is not an abstract diplomatic problem but a matter of physical survival. For Ukraine, Russian aggression is not a conflict over territory in the narrow sense but a war against the very right of the country to exist as an independent state.
It is here that Ukraine and Israel truly find themselves on the same historical plane.
Defense, politics, and Israeli experience for Ukraine
The interview also raised the question of the “Iron Dome,” which Ukraine requested from Israel after the start of the full-scale war.
Brodsky did not return to old disputes about whether this system is suitable for Ukrainian territory. Instead, he noted something else: Ukraine and Israel have enormous potential for cooperation in the field of technology and defense experience.
He acknowledged that Israel has modern developments, but they are often more expensive than Ukrainian solutions.
This is an important point.
Over the years of war, Ukraine has created enormous practical experience in the field of drones, interceptors, cheap technological solutions, adapting civilian technologies for military purposes, and rapidly scaling defense innovations. This may be of interest to Israel no less than to Ukraine — Israeli security systems.
Israel as a “loud country” and the power of democracy
Brodsky also spoke about Israel’s internal politics.
He called Israel a very loud country where political life is constantly boiling. According to him, a difficult election campaign is expected ahead, but this is precisely where the strength of the state manifests itself.
Such a thesis is understandable to Ukrainians as well.
Ukraine also lives in conditions of acute politics, strong internal disputes, and constant public pressure on the authorities. But in democratic countries, noise does not always mean weakness. Sometimes it means that society is not disconnected, not intimidated, and not turned into a silent mass.
In this sense, Israel and Ukraine are similar: both countries argue, criticize, demand answers from the authorities, and at the same time continue to fight for their existence.
Extradition, citizenship, and the Kolomoisky case
The interview also touched on sensitive topics related to Israeli citizenship, possible extradition, and Ukrainian figures in high-profile cases.
Brodsky emphasized that Israel considers each case separately and does not have an automatic policy of extraditing people to other countries. There have been cases when Israel extradited people at the request of different states, but there have also been refusals.
Separately, he commented on the situation with Israeli citizens who are in custody abroad, including Ihor Kolomoisky in Ukraine.
Israel’s position, according to the ambassador, is simple: any Israeli citizen imprisoned in another country has the right to contact the consul. The consul is obliged to check whether their rights are being violated and whether any illegal actions are being taken against them.
But Israel does not interfere in the legal processes of another country.
This is an important boundary: consular protection is not equal to political cover and does not mean the cancellation of local justice.
USA, Trump, and Israel’s ability to rely on itself
In the final part of the interview, Brodsky spoke about the relations between Israel and the USA.
He noted that Donald Trump did a lot for Israel and is considered one of the most pro-Israel American presidents. According to the ambassador, the relationship between Trump and the Prime Minister of Israel has developed over decades, and the strategic alliance with the USA remains an important part of the country’s security.
But Brodsky added a fundamental thought: Israel has learned to rely not only on allies but also on itself.
This concerns the army, defense industry, military technologies, the ability to outpace enemies, and quickly adapt to threats. US support is important, but it does not replace the state’s own strength.
For Ukraine, this conclusion sounds especially relevant.
Allies are important. Western weapons are important. Political support is important. But ultimately, the survival of the country also depends on the internal spirit, mobilization of society, technological courage, and the ability not to wait for salvation only from outside.
This is exactly what Brodsky said at the very beginning of the blitz: for victory, the spirit of the people is most important.
In Michael Brodsky’s interview, there is no simple formula “Israel is fully with Ukraine” or “Israel is cautious because of Russia.” The picture is more complex. Israel recognizes Russian aggression, supports Ukraine’s territorial integrity, looks sharply at Moscow’s alliance with Iran and Hamas, but at the same time operates in a tough regional reality where every word of a diplomat can have consequences.
The main conclusion sounds clear: Ukraine and Israel live in a world where enemies test not only borders but also the will of society. And in this test, diplomacy, weapons, technology, and national resilience have long become parts of one security system.