Conversation between Netanyahu and Zelensky “I hope it will take place in the coming days” – Israeli Ambassador Brodsky, about what?

The phone conversation between Volodymyr Zelensky and Benjamin Netanyahu, which has been talked about in Kyiv and Jerusalem in recent days, apparently has not been removed from the agenda. The Israeli Ambassador to Ukraine Michael Brodsky in an interview on March 25, 2026, for Ukrainian RBC reported that the contact did not take place due to technical reasons, but the parties expect to conduct it in the coming days. For the Israeli audience, this is an important detail: it is not about a formal call for protocol, but about a conversation against the backdrop of a direct Iranian threat, war in the region, and increasingly noticeable intersection of Israeli and Ukrainian agendas.

According to Brodsky, the initiative for the conversation came from the Israeli side. He specifically indicated that the main topic will likely be the Middle East and primarily Iran. This in itself says a lot about the current moment: Jerusalem seems to want to discuss with Kyiv not only bilateral relations but also a broader contour of threats that now links Israel, Ukraine, Russia, and Iran into one tense chain.

Why this conversation is important not only for Kyiv but also for Israel

In ordinary diplomatic logic, such a call could be presented as a routine contact between the leaders of two countries. The situation is different now. Israel is engaged in a tough confrontation with the Iranian axis, Ukraine has been repelling Russian aggression for more than four years and has long been facing Iranian weapons on its territory. Therefore, the topic of Iran in the conversation between Zelensky and Netanyahu does not appear secondary but central.

For the Israeli reader, there is one unpleasant but understandable conclusion. Ukraine and Israel increasingly find themselves in the same field of threats, even if their wars differ in geography and scale. What used to sound like a diplomatic formula about “common challenges” now has quite specific content: drones, Iran’s military cooperation with Russia, pressure on Western allies, attempts to expand regional crises beyond one front.

Iran becomes a common theme not at the level of slogans but at the level of security

Brodsky directly stated that the presumed key topic of the conversation will be the situation in the Middle East and the Iranian threat. This is important also because Kyiv today views Iran not as a distant Middle Eastern problem of Israel, but as a state that has been helping Russia in the war against Ukraine for years. In Jerusalem, accordingly, they see that the Ukrainian front has long been linked with the Iranian factor.

What gratitude for recognizing the IRGC as a terrorist organization means

A separate topic, which, according to Brodsky, Netanyahu is unlikely to miss, will be gratitude to Ukraine for recognizing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization. Israel has already publicly indicated that it highly values this decision by Kyiv and considers it an important precedent. In diplomatic language, such formulations are rarely accidental: it is both a political signal of support and a fixation that Ukraine has taken a position on this issue that Jerusalem considers principled.

Here it is worth paying attention to another point.

Brodsky emphasized that after the Ukrainian decision, similar steps were taken by other countries. For Israel, this is convenient not only symbolically. When one of the countries under constant military attack takes such a step first, it helps to expand the international legitimacy of pressure on Iranian power structures. This means that the upcoming conversation between Zelensky and Netanyahu may become not just an exchange of pleasantries but part of broader political coordination.

In this sense, NAnews — Israel News | Nikk.Agency sees in the upcoming contact not a passing diplomatic episode, but a symptom of a deeper process: Ukraine and Israel increasingly talk to each other through the prism of the same threat emanating from Tehran, even if it manifests on different maps and by different means.

What the conversation between Zelensky and Netanyahu might actually be about

Officially, the exact agenda of the conversation has not yet been disclosed.

But from the ambassador’s words, three main themes clearly emerge. The first is the Middle East and the current confrontation around Iran. The second is the Ukrainian decision on the IRGC and the political consequences of this step. The third is a broader security context where Israeli and Ukrainian experiences increasingly do not exist separately from each other.

This is why the very fact of the upcoming call is important already now, even before it takes place. For Kyiv, it is an opportunity to strengthen contact with the Israeli leadership at a time of new regional turbulence. For Israel, it is a chance to discuss the Iranian factor with Ukraine not in abstraction, but against the backdrop of a real war in which Tehran has long been participating not only with words. And if the conversation does indeed take place in the coming days, it should be read not as a diplomatic formality but as part of a rapidly changing architecture of alliances and threats.