Will Trump pressure Netanyahu? Allies’ attachment to “Palestine” tests the president’s policy

Washington, September 23, 2025 — At the United Nations this week, international discontent with U.S. actions regarding the Gaza conflict became evident when America’s allies recognized the Palestinian state. This move posed a significant test for Donald Trump’s Middle East policy, notes www.timesofisrael.com.

The increasing military pressure from Israel amid the conflict, which began on October 7, 2023, with Hamas’s invasion of southern Israel, makes Trump appear as a bystander. It seems he is in no hurry to take control of the actions of his closest ally in regional politics.

Early in his second term, Trump promised to quickly end the war between Israel and Hamas, but the situation is becoming more complicated. The special operation launched by the Israeli military undermines Trump’s peace initiatives. Initially, he tried to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza, but Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar became a serious obstacle to his efforts.

Situation in Gaza

Since the resumption of the ground operation in Gaza, the U.S. has been observing the situation quite passively, accepting Israel’s actions without objections. Amid the worsening humanitarian crisis, the international community has condemned such actions.

Recognition of the Palestinian State

Despite Trump’s warnings about recognizing Palestine, many countries, including the United Kingdom, France, Canada, and Australia, made such a decision. This significant diplomatic change occurred during a UN session.

In his speech at the General Assembly, Trump expressed support for Netanyahu’s criticism of countries’ aspirations to recognize Palestine. He commented that such steps only strengthen Hamas’s position and could lead to further violence.

Manifestations of Uncertainty

Trump’s inability to achieve significant results in the peace process after returning to the presidency is drawing criticism. Some experts point out that Trump’s hopes for a parliamentary diplomatic approach with Arab and Muslim states are hindered by the consequences of the internal political situation in the U.S.

Discussion of Peace Settlement

At meetings on the sidelines of the UN, Trump discussed with Arab leaders possible plans for managing Gaza after the conflict ends, without Hamas’s involvement. Trump’s interest in the peace initiative remains despite growing pressure from non-Middle Eastern states.

Trump’s foreign policy, often manifesting in contradictions with his closest allies, suggests maintaining strong relations with Israel, confirming his support for the country, which causes dissatisfaction among many participants on the international stage.

Concerns for Future Agreements

Some analysts note that Israel may continue the annexation of the West Bank, which will negatively affect potential peace initiatives. This also threatens many agreements, such as the “Abraham Accords” — the process of normalizing relations between Arab countries and Israel.

Reaction of the International Community

France and the United Kingdom warned against any forms of annexation, emphasizing that this would be a “red line” in international politics. Their authority may be at risk if Trump does not pressure Netanyahu to stop the violence.

In the context of growing international tension, it is important to consider how U.S. actions affect the prospects for peace in the region. Feeling the pressure, Trump may be developing his own strategies, however, the need to resolve the conflict in Gaza remains relevant.