The absence of a Nobel Peace Prize in 2025 may motivate Trump to double his efforts for peace.

The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize was marked by an unexpected twist: Maria Corina Machado, the leader of the Venezuelan opposition, became the laureate, leaving the U.S. president without the much-desired award.

Machado’s Triumph

The Norwegian Nobel Committee recognized Machado for her relentless fight for democratic rights in Venezuela. Her efforts for a peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy deserve recognition. However, the question remains: how well does her activity align with the criteria established by Alfred Nobel?

Nobel bequeathed the award to those who promote fraternity between nations and the reduction of armies. Machado undoubtedly showed courage in standing up to Nicolás Maduro, but her alignment with these criteria is debated.

Unusual Campaign

The campaign surrounding the prize this year was unusual. Donald Trump actively promoted his candidacy, using every opportunity, including a speech at the UN General Assembly. He claimed to have resolved seven wars, but these statements raised doubts.

Although the prize criteria allow for recognition of efforts, Trump’s chances were slim. His role in the temporary ceasefire in Gaza was notable, but most of his claims remained unverified.

Historical Parallels

The history of the Nobel Peace Prize knows controversial decisions. Henry Kissinger and Abiy Ahmed Ali are examples of laureates whose actions sparked debates. Kissinger, despite negotiating the end of the Vietnam War, is known for the devastating bombings of Cambodia. Abiy, who received the prize for peace initiatives, later waged a brutal war in Tigray.

Against this backdrop, Trump seems more deserving, but comparisons with Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Jimmy Carter do not favor him. Their achievements in peace and diplomacy remain unmatched.

Complex Path

Trump, having returned to the White House in 2025, failed to demonstrate an impeccable peacemaker record. His threats to annex Greenland and incorporate Canada into the U.S., as well as involvement in bombings of Iran and Venezuela, create a controversial image.

These actions sharply contrast with Barack Obama’s approach, who received the prize in 2009 for efforts to strengthen international diplomacy. Although this decision also sparked debates, it was more of an advance for the future.

Perhaps the absence of the award in 2025 will motivate Trump to double his efforts for peace. If his claims of ending wars are confirmed, it will be a significant contribution, regardless of his motives.