The European Union and the United States publicly demonstrate readiness to coordinate efforts on security issues and the future of the continent. Meanwhile, Russia’s position remains tough and practically unchanged, which significantly limits the space for diplomatic maneuvering. In this context, the Paris agreements appear not as a finale, but as an intermediate point.
The key element of the entire structure is the role of Ukraine. The maintenance and support of the approximately 700,000-strong Ukrainian army are considered in Brussels as the foundation of European security. Without the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the idea of protecting Europe’s eastern flank turns into a theory not supported by real resources. For the European Union, this is no longer an abstract question, but a practical task for years to come.
Against this backdrop, the main question for Kyiv arises: will Ukraine be able to extract the maximum from the situation? At stake is the prospect of integration into the EU, long-term financial support, and participation in pan-European security mechanisms. Other ideas, including discussions of possible British-French peacekeeping missions, remain secondary and do not change the strategic picture.
The geopolitical part of the equation is complicated by external factors. Russia still does not show readiness for substantive negotiations. However, analysts point out: if the USA and Israel achieve tangible results in the Iranian direction, this could create serious problems for Moscow in the oil markets. Such a scenario could potentially strengthen Washington’s position in dialogue with China and eventually force the Kremlin to adjust its line.
For now, all this remains at the level of calculations and assumptions. The Paris agreements do not provide quick answers but clearly show the prioritization and limits of possible compromises. In the coming months, it will be practical steps, not statements, that determine which way the balance of power will shift. NAnews — News of Israel | Nikk.Agency
